 |
Duration: 05:39 minutes
Upload Time: 2007-08-05 01:45:48
User: cortmeister262
:::: Favorites
:::: Top Videos of Day
|
Description:
This new hater named 'micers' commented on one of my anti-Bush video's "Our Moron In Chief", he called me a "Content Forger', does anyone know what that even means? Did I DO that? What IS that anyway?
|
Comments |
ssguerrand ::: Favorites
I always think it's weird when I look at one of those no video hater pages, and they have a subscriber. Why would anyone subscribe to a channel that has NO CONTENT, not even favorites. lol
07-08-06 10:59:01
__________________________________________________ |
onlywhenprovoked ::: Favorites
I'm all too familiar with copyright laws and intellectual property laws. Even if someone owned the phrase "moron in chief", you used it in a not for profit situation which is covered under "fair use". He's just talking out his ass, probably because he can't refute your actual statements.
07-08-05 12:09:07
__________________________________________________ |
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites
Every time I do a video, if I'm talking about a specific news story, I'll Google it to make sure to get the facts right.
When I do make a mistake, I admit it.
There's no point in even making videos where I'm trying to persuade people that my point of view is right and true, if I was going to lie. I hate it when I get the facts wrong, like in my latest video about Pat Tillman's Helmet, I said he was shot from 10 feet when I meant to say 10 yards.
DOoh!
Credibility is everything.
07-08-05 16:22:48
__________________________________________________ |
onlywhenprovoked ::: Favorites
I've made a few mistakes in my videos simular to that, (my ron paul vid for instance) which is what happens sometimes when you are talking off the cuff instead of reading off a monitor like the "journalists" on tv. If you correct yourself in the video description box, it's all good.
When they don't have facts to argue, the especially weak ones turn to ad homenims to try and get you to think emotionally instead of logically.
07-08-05 16:35:07
__________________________________________________ |
proudfootz ::: Favorites
Isn't <i>content forgery</i> like when they changed the cause of Pat Tillman's death from 'shot by his own guys' to 'death in battle with enemy soldiers'?
The methods of the trolls and haters must be exposed, so it's <i>not</i> a complete waste of time to deal with theses parasites.
07-08-05 10:31:52
__________________________________________________ |
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites
It just pisses me off to be accused of something that I didn't do. Most of the time I just ignore them unless they have a valid criticism, then I try to address it. After all, I'd like to change their minds and win them over. Once in a while I they'll come up with a new tactic that I haven't seen before, like this guy.
07-08-05 16:43:29
__________________________________________________ |
abbnormalfunctions ::: Favorites
Iamacortmeisterzombie... Ha!
Maybe he means that you don't really believe what you're saying? Hmmm... Why I could never really be a hater; too much work.
07-08-05 03:43:13
__________________________________________________ |
cortmeister262 ::: Favorites
I hear you, I don't have enough time in a day to do all the things that I have to do, let alone the things that I WANT to do.
Who has the time or the inclination to be a hater anyway?
07-08-05 16:52:44
__________________________________________________ |
